youtubecelebrity.tv

油管名人电视

(Celebrity Media Alliance)

In countries and regions where those YouTube channels are blocked, you can click the image above to watch the live stream.

UN Web TV LIVE

World Hot News

UN General Assembly demands Israel end ‘unlawful presence’ in Occupied Palestinian Territory

Result of the General Assembly vote on a draft resolution on the ICJ advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian TerritoryUN Photo/Evan Schneider Result of the General Assembly vote on a draft resolution on the ICJ advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

The United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday voted overwhelmingly to adopt a resolution that demands that Israel “brings to an end without delay its unlawful presence” in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

With a recorded vote of 124 nations in favour, 14 against, and 43 abstentions, the resolution calls for Israel to comply with international law and withdraw its military forces, immediately cease all new settlement activity, evacuate all settlers from occupied land, and dismantle parts of the separation wall it constructed inside the occupied West Bank.

The General Assembly further demanded that Israel return land and other “immovable property”, as well as all assets seized since the occupation began in 1967, and all cultural property and assets taken from Palestinians and Palestinian institutions.

The resolution also demands Israel allow all Palestinians displaced during the occupation to return to their place of origin and make reparation for the damage caused by its occupation.

The resolution stems from the advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in July, in which the Court declared that Israel’s continued presence in the Territory “is unlawful”, and that “all States are under an obligation not to recognize” the decades-long occupation.

Threat to peace and security

The Assembly “strongly deplored the continued and total disregard and breaches” by the Government of Israel of its obligations under the UN Charter, international law and UN resolutions, stressing that such breaches “seriously threaten” regional and international peace and security.

It also recognized that Israel “must be held to account for any violations” of international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including of international humanitarian and human rights laws.

The text says Israel “must bear the legal consequences of all its internationally wrongful acts, including by making reparation for the injury, including any damage, caused by such acts.”

The General Assembly highlighted the need for the establishment of an international mechanism for reparations to address damage, loss, or injury caused by Israel’s actions.

It also called for creating an international register of damage caused, to document evidence and related claims.

International conference

The resolution also includes a decision to convene an international conference during the Assembly’s current session to implement UN resolutions pertaining to the question of Palestine and the two-State solution for the achievement of a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the Middle East.

Additionally, the Assembly requested the UN Secretary-General to present proposals for a mechanism to follow up on Israel’s violations of article 3 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, as identified by the ICJ.

Article 3 refers to racial segregation and apartheid and the undertaking by International Convention’s States Parties to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all practices of this nature in territories under their jurisdiction.

General Assembly votes on a draft resolution on the ICJ advisory opinion.UN Photo/Evan Schneider General Assembly votes on a draft resolution on the ICJ advisory opinion.

Call on States

In its resolution, the General Assembly called upon all UN Member States to comply with their obligations under international law and take concrete steps to address Israel’s ongoing presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

The Assembly urged States to refrain from recognizing Israel’s presence in the Territory as lawful and to ensure that they do not provide aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by the occupation. This includes taking measures to prevent their nationals, companies, and entities under their jurisdiction from engaging in activities that support or sustain Israel’s occupation.

Additionally, the Assembly called on States to cease importing products originating from Israeli settlements and to halt the transfer of arms, munitions, and related equipment to Israel in cases where there are reasonable grounds to suspect they may be used in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

Moreover, the resolution urged States to implement sanctions, such as travel bans and asset freezes, against individuals and entities involved in maintaining Israel’s unlawful presence in the Territory. This includes addressing issues related to settler violence and ensuring that those engaged in these activities face legal and financial consequences.

Adjournment

Finally, the Assembly temporarily adjourned its tenth emergency special session and authorized the President of the General Assembly to reconvene the session upon request from Member States.

The special session is a continuation of the tenth emergency special session of the General Assembly that last met in May amid the ongoing crisis in Gaza, during which it adopted a resolution, laying out additional rights for the State of Palestine’s participation in Assembly meetings.

That resolution did not grant Palestine the right to vote or put forward its candidature to UN Main Organs such as the Security Council or the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC).

It also did not confer membership to the State of Palestine, which requires a specific recommendation from the Security Council.

South Korean Minister of Trade etc. speeches on ROK-US Economic Cooperation and the Impact of the US Elections

Good morning, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. I am Inol Lee, the Executive Vice Chairman of the Korea International Trade Association. I am delighted to host this important event alongside the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy of the Republic of Korea, the Korea Society, and the Korean Chamber of Commerce and Industry in the United States.

First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to President Thomas B. of the Korea Society and Korean Trade Minister Joho for joining us today. My thanks also go to all the distinguished guests for taking the time to attend today's event.

Today's event occurs at a pivotal moment in Korea-U.S. relations, particularly with the upcoming presidential election in the United States. Korean companies are closely monitoring the situation, considering all possible outcomes, as the U.S. remains Korea's top investment destination and a key trading partner. The interest in this election is higher than ever due to its potential to influence U.S. economic and security policies.

At the same time, Korea-U.S. economic ties are stronger than ever. What began as a military and security alliance has evolved into a comprehensive partnership that encompasses economic and technological cooperation. The bilateral trade between our two countries continues to grow, driven by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). The trade volume between our two nations has increased in a few key areas.

First, it is crucial that the support provided under relevant U.S. acts, such as the Inflation Reduction Act, continues, allowing Korean companies to contribute effectively to U.S. policy goals. Additionally, as reliable economic partners, Korean companies should receive consistent support from the U.S. government, ensuring successful establishment and operation in the country. This includes favorable handling of import quotas and tariffs on key raw materials and intermediary goods from Korea, which are essential for production and construction of new factories.

Furthermore, facilitating the visa process for highly skilled Korean workers, who are vital to the operation of new facilities, would provide significant relief to many Korean companies. The relationship between Korea and the United States stands as a success story of mutual prosperity, admired by the international community, and I expect it to continue in the future.

As I conclude, I hope today's event serves as a meaningful opportunity to reflect on and strengthen the economic partnership between our two nations. Thank you.

Good morning, everyone. It is my pleasure to welcome you all to this special panel discussion on U.S.-Korea economic cooperation and the potential impact of the upcoming U.S. election. As we review the progress of U.S.-Korea relations, it's important to recognize the evolution of our economic cooperation, which has grown from reliance after the Korean War into a dynamic and mutually beneficial trade relationship. This culminated in the KORUS FTA, which was implemented in 2012.

Today, South Korea is not only one of the United States' largest trading partners but also an increasingly important source of foreign direct investment, particularly in strategic industries such as green energy, semiconductors, and electric vehicle batteries. Beyond economic cooperation, Korea's soft power is making a significant mark in the U.S., from cultural industries to the K-food market, further solidifying the strong ties between our people.

In this context, we are proud to co-host today's discussion with the Korea Chamber of Commerce in the U.S. and South Korea's Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy. These organizations have played key roles in strengthening the robust trade and investment relationship between the U.S. and Korea. The Korea Society is honored to collaborate on this event, especially in light of the shifting trade and investment landscape amid geopolitical sensitivities surrounding the U.S. election in November.

Now, it is more important than ever that we maintain a strong alliance with key partners, including South Korea, to ensure stability and order in this uncertain era. Let me now introduce His Excellency, Trade Minister Ino Chun, who will deliver congratulatory remarks.

Dr. Chun has served as Trade Minister since January 2024 and brings over 20 years of expertise in trade and commerce. He has held policy advisory roles in the presidential office, National Assembly, and academia, further establishing his leadership in trade policy. Without further ado, please join me in welcoming His Excellency, Trade Minister Ino Chun.

Good morning. I am the Minister for Trade of Korea, and it is a great pleasure to meet you all. Today’s event at the Korea Society in New York is of true significance for our unwavering alliance and strong economic ties between Korea and the U.S. I would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Leo, Executive Vice Chairman of the Korea Society, President Thomas J. B., and all the staff members for preparing this event.

As you are well aware, the U.S. is Korea's most important economic and trading partner. Our bilateral trade and investment relations have made significant progress since the implementation of the KORUS FTA in 2012. As of 2023, the U.S. stands as Korea's top investment destination and second-largest trading partner. Korean companies are making massive investments in cutting-edge sectors in the U.S., such as semiconductors and batteries, thereby expanding our traditional security alliance into a high-tech supply chain alliance.

The Korean government is also striving to foster industrial and economic cooperation based on the strong will of our leaders for collaboration. The Korea-U.S. Supply Chain and Commercial Dialogue (SCCD) was launched last year to facilitate collaboration in supply chains and cutting-edge industries. Additionally, we are working to create a fair and free trade environment between our countries through the KORUS FTA joint committee.

Through close communications with the U.S. Congress, the Korean government is making efforts to address the needs and challenges of Korean companies operating in the U.S. At the same time, we are closely monitoring U.S. political decisions and administrative measures that may impact the Korean economy.

Esteemed guests, your presence at this event provides a valuable opportunity to create new and innovative business partnerships and elevate the Korea-U.S. alliance to even greater heights. I look forward to constructive discussions today on our common vision, focusing on cooperation rather than uncertainties. The Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy will spare no effort to usher in a bright future. Thank you.

Guterres calls for ‘culture of peace’ and global unity, as crises mount

Secretary-General António Guterres rings the Peace Bell during the ceremony held at UN headquarters in observance of the International Day of Peace 2024 (21 September).UN Photo/Mark Garten Secretary-General António Guterres rings the Peace Bell during the ceremony held at UN headquarters in observance of the International Day of Peace 2024 (21 September).

By Vibhu Mishra

Amid escalating global conflicts, deepening divisions and mounting crisis, the UN Secretary-General on Friday urged everyone around the world to “cultivate a culture of peace”.

Speaking at the annual Peace Bell Ceremony, António Guterres warned that war is spreading, inequalities are growing, and new technologies are being weaponized without safeguards.

International institutions must be better positioned to respond,” he stressed.

The Secretary-General’s appeal comes ahead of a pivotal moment for global cooperation.

Later this month, world leaders will gather for the Summit of the Future, a landmark event aimed at tackling pressing challenges impacting human rights, climate change and security, military technology – and efforts to get the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) back on track.

“We have a chance for change…in short, we must ‘cultivate a culture of peace’,” he emphasized.

International Peace Day

That, Mr. Guterres continued, is also the theme of this year’s International Day of Peace, which will be marked on 21 September.

It is a cause all us devotees of peace and justice must rally behind, this day and everyday – through the Summit of the Future and beyond,” he said.

Establishing the International Day in 1981, the General Assembly declared that it should be devoted to commemorating and strengthening the ideals of peace both within and among all nations and peoples.

Two decades later, in 2001, the General Assembly further designated the International Day as a time of non-violence; calling for ceasefires worldwide.

Work for tolerance

Also speaking at the ceremony, Philémon Yang, President of the 79th session of the General Assembly, underscored the need to restore trust and solidarity among nations.

He noted conflicts and crises mounting - from Ukraine and Gaza to Sudan, Myanmar, Haiti and elsewhere - adding that people are “desperately looking for a glimmer of hope”.“Let us ring the Peace Bell today and send a message of hope for peace. Let us work towards tolerance and dialogue,” he urged.

In so doing, we can also accelerate progress towards sustainable development and ensure universal respect for the human dignity of everyone, everywhere, he added.

A view of the Peace Bell at the UN Headquarters, in New York.UN Photo/Loey Felipe A view of the Peace Bell at the UN Headquarters, in New York.

Bell rings out

The ceremony included the traditional ringing of the Peace Bell, which was cast in the 1950s from coins and medals donated by people all over the world, including the Pope, as a symbol of hope for peace.

The Bell is rung twice a year: on the first day of spring, at the Vernal Equinox, and to commemorate the International Day for Peace.

The Peace Bell has also sounded on other special occasions, such as on 26 April 2011 to mark 25 years since the devastating Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident.

Joint Media Stakeout on Climate, Peace and Security & the UN Peacekeeping Operations

Good morning. Today, the Security Council convened for an open debate on UN peacekeeping operations. France, Guyana, Japan, Malta, Mozambique, the Republic of Korea, Sierra Leone, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States, and my own country, Slovenia, underscore the importance of a holistic approach to the climate, peace, and security in the context of the UN peacekeeping.

If the UN peacekeeping operations are to successfully fulfill their indispensable mandates, climate change considerations need to be taken into account. In this context, we take this opportunity to highlight three key messages.

First, climate change and environmental degradation can exacerbate risks to international peace and security. Fragile and conflict-affected countries and communities are among the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. To enhance the effectiveness of UN peacekeeping operations, it is essential to integrate data-based environment and climate security considerations where appropriate into risk assessments, monitoring, planning, reporting, and mandate implementation.

Risk assessment and risk management should be inclusive, comprehensive, and gender-responsive, so the needs of all affected communities are addressed, and peacekeeping efforts are sustainable. Climate security advisers within the UN peacekeeping operations can play a significant role in mapping risks and providing valuable guidance to both missions and host authorities on practical actions that may be taken. We reiterate our call for the appointment of a UN Special Representative for Climate Peace and Security to address the intersection of climate and conflict from an evidence-based point of view.

Second, we believe UN peacekeeping operations can mitigate conflict-related risks exacerbated by climate change by working with host communities and the UN country team. This can contribute to the development of conflict-sensitive approaches to adaptation and mitigation responses on one hand and climate-sensitive approaches to conflict management, prevention, and peacebuilding on the other, thereby reinforcing the benefits of climate action alongside peace and security efforts.

Considerations of the adverse effects of climate change in the mandates of UNIS, MINUSCA, MONUSCO, and UNMISS missions, comprising 75% of all currently deployed peacekeeping personnel, represent a decisive contribution toward these goals.

Third, UN peacekeeping operations must adapt to ensure their own operational effectiveness and abilities to implement mandated tasks, including the protection of civilians. This requires careful assessment and planning. We emphasize the importance of the United Nations Department of Operational Support strategy, and I quote, "The Way Forward: Environmental Strategy for Peace Operations 2023 to 2030." Good stewardship of resources ultimately contributes to a positive legacy in host countries as part of the wider UN efforts beyond missions' deployment.

Finally, we commend the troop and police-contributing countries for their innovation, professionalism, and commitment in adapting their approach and capabilities to effectively operate in environments increasingly impacted by climate change. We stand before you today ready to forge ahead in our efforts to advance a systematic, responsive, inclusive, and evidence-based approach to climate, peace, and security in the context of UN peacekeeping operations.

Thank you.

Online

We have 136 guests and no members online